Katie & Scott & Simon & Cecily.

Author: Scott (Page 96 of 104)

Day 18: lazy sunday

Woke up in the almost afternoon.  Went to Arby’s for lunch.  Been cleaning the house and checking my work email and bugs since then.

Arby’s now serves “Roast Burgers” which is weird.  They’re essentially the same roast beef sandwiches they’ve always had but on a different bun and served with lettuce, tomato, and sometimes bacon.

I think cleaning a pile of old stuff always takes longer than it should because you find things that you don’t expect and spend a few moments reminiscing on each found object.  Even with only 26 years of life behind me, there’s already a lot of history on the floor of our study.

For example, here’s a random old picture that I took of Shady Side Academy (where I went to high school) back from when I was but a teenager.  It’s not a great camera and I think that’s my finger blocking the lower-left corner, but still.

image0

I’m not sure what I was thinking when I took this picture.  I was probably attempting to capture the serene snowy landscape and a piece of SSA history.  I’d guess it was probably taken senior year.

Snow wasn’t uncommon in Pittsburgh, so this isn’t too extraordinary.  Except that the same picture now wouldn’t be the same.  A new performing arts center has been built in the middle of the hill and a new path has been put across the quad.  So, that picture above could never be taken again.  And, of course, there are students in it that have long graduated.

Something else we came across: the Kudos Award we got right before I proposed to Katie.  Notice that Theresa put a cute paw sticker on the bottom corner.

image0-1

Time is relentless.  I wonder what new Kudos awards S’n’S has instituted and whether they’ve dropped any of the old ones.  I doubt they’re still using the web app I wrote for Kudos proposing and voting.

There are also a few props I swiped from various S’n’S produtions, which one of the best morally ambiguous things I’ve ever done.  Any people still in S’n’S reading this: take a small piece of a production you’re in.  It’ll be the best way to keep a memory of the shows that mean that most to you after you graduate.  I was told that by Hunter Howe, and I wish I had begun to do it earlier.

To finish off, here’s a young Katie with some friends.  And a blue man.

image0-2

Day 17: a review of non-existent music

This album was generated via the latest meme to hit my Facebook Friends.

The artist is from a random Wikipedia article title, the album title is from the last few words on a random quotation, and the art is from Flickr’s recent interesting pictures.

albumcover

I decided to take it a step further and write a short review of said album.

Wentworth’s Folly

When Philip Wentworth burst onto the scene last year with the bizarrely brilliant asks for nothing, it was hard not to take notice.  Combining interesting and rarely heard instrumental arrangements with a knowledge of rock history, the entirely instrumental rock album was a breath of fresh air in today’s top 40 obsessed era.

If anything, it was too inaccessible.  Aside from the emotionally charged and very short “for diane,” none of the tracks got radio play and it felt like Wentworth would be remembered as that odd, talented artist that no one had ever heard of.

Philip Wentworth’s sophomore album has a lot going for it.  In many ways, it feels like a direct response to critics, as half the tracks on this album involve vocals, although not all of them may be considered singing, strictly speaking.  However, it gets mired down by how exceptional asks for nothing was.  There are rhythms and arrangements here that we’ve heard before.

“born to fail,” “the underground railroad,” and “booms in my head” all sound like tired rehashes of better tracks from asks for nothing.  The vocals, while stirring, start to blend together and it won’t be long before you can’t tell if you’re listening to “fascinating scism” or “the sale at macy’s.”

That’s not to say there isn’t original stuff on there.  Title track “what we think of ourselves” flows so smoothly that you’ll feel sad when it ends and it’s one of the few places where the vocals complement instead of clash with the music.

Wentworth’s crown jewel on this album, though, is clearly the gut-wrenching ten minute instrumental that closes it out.  “regarding my beheading after the battle of hexham” is better than everything else on the album put together.  If you’re thinking of buying one Wentworth track online, I heartily recommend it over my previous favorite from asks for nothing, “underwear.”

Still, unlike his first, this isn’t a groundbreaking album and with the odd choices Wentworth makes in many of his tracks, it may have the exact opposite effect than intended.  what we think of ourselves will be a must-get for current fans of his music, but it may even further alienate the general music-buying public.

Day 16: some haikus about video games

Poetic interlude or excuse because I have nothing to write about?  You decide!

The ESRB
gave our game an M rating.
Let’s take out the blood.

Why are the save points
so far apart?  I just want
to go to bed soon.

Is there anything
as heartbreaking as when your
bug comes back fix failed?

Why did you shoot me?
We’re on the same team!  Oh, I
see.  You’re just a jerk.

While running back, I
see you and am glad you chose
to be a medic.

I think we should put
that feature in.  It will raise
our Metacritic.

Through several weeks of
scientific research, I’ve
found I do need sleep.

The secret to life:
Up up down down left right left
oh, you know the rest.

The futility,
the unfairness of it all:
a spiky blue shell.

What do you mean, you
haven’t played Portal yet?  Stop
reading, go play now.

That giant zombie
just vomited on me.  I
can’t see.  Now I’m dead.

Did you really think
we could get through this instance
without a tank?  Fool.

And a William Carlos Williams bonus!

This is Just to Say
I have played
the savegame
that you left on
when you went to the bathroom

and which
you had been probably
playing
for the past few months

Forgive me
it was fun
so exciting
until I died

As you can see, I’ve also been kind of obsessed with “blockquotes” in these last couple posts.

Day 15: xbox live vs. the word “gay”

I don’t consider myself an active gay rights activist, although I was quite sad when Prop 8 passed last year.  And I cried during Milk at the Oscar Showcase.  Regardless, I’m not much of an anything activist these days.

But sometimes, things just get me riled up.  Like this story on the Consumerist yesterday.  The summary: saying that you’re a lesbian in your profile on Xbox Live can get you banned.  Follow the story back and you’ll see that Microsoft has a precedent of doing similar things with other accounts:

It is barely believable to me that in a year when Milk wins two Academy Awards and when our president has gone on record about overturning Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, this is still allowed to happen.  (This post is a bit longer, because I got passionate and kept writing.  You’ve been warned.)

The rationale behind this, on Microsoft’s end, boils down to these paragraphs in the Xbox Live Terms of Use:

In addition, your use of the Service is subject to your compliance with the Code of Conduct (www.xbox.com/en-us/live/codeofconduct.htm and its successors).  You agree that we may also discontinue your access to the Service if you do any of the following while connected to the Service:

  • Create a Gamertag , avatar or use text in other profile fields that may offend other members.  This includes comments that look, sound like, stand for, hint at, abbreviate, or insinuate or relate to any of the following: profane words/phrases, topics or content of a sexual nature, hate speech (including but not limited to racial, ethnic, or religious slurs), illegal drugs/controlled substances, or illegal activities;

That’s pretty broad, eh?  Regardless, I’d like to break down why I think the arguments for doing this are not good enough.

It’s information that shouldn’t be there/they brought this on themselves
A popular argument is that these gamers shouldn’t have put information about their sexual orientation in their gamertags or profiles.  By “flaunting” it, they brought the ban upon themselves because they were inciting other gamers to complain.

This is ridiculous in regards to the latest ban, where the information is in the profile – an area that encourages gamers to tell others a bit about themselves.  The idea that being gay is not relevant information for Xbox Live is like saying that any piece of information not related to gaming has no place there.  Should I avoid putting that I like fishing in my profile?  What does that have to do with gaming?

Even where the word “gay” is in the gamertag instead of the profile, how is that irrelevant information?  I assume it’s a large part of that person’s identity, just like if I had a gamertag like “TheShanghaiKid.”  Would that get banned?

Saying that they brought this on themselves is akin to saying that we should accept Xbox Live as a community where homophobia is the norm and accepted.  While it may be true, that’s not something we need to accept.

Think of the children!
So, it’s not really as panicky as the clichéd expression, but I’ve seen others comment that children should be protected from seeing such things at a young age.  What if parents don’t want to have to explain sex to their six year old playing Viva Pinata online with TheGayGamer?

Well, tough.  There are many things that you don’t get to control the timing of in your child’s life.  You don’t really get to choose when you have to explain that you’ve been lying about Santa.  You don’t really get to choose when you get to explain that many people look different on the outside.  Add this to the list.  Besides, explaining to a child about homosexuality doesn’t mean explaining intercourse.  Maybe the sooner a child learns that gay people exist and are no different from everyone else in most regards, maybe the less homophobic that child will be.

It’s in the Terms of Use.  Microsoft has a right to do this.
Maybe.  The Terms of Use seem intentionally vague and broad in regards to who Microsoft can ban, and from the stories that get published, it seems that they end up folding under pressure from other members of Xbox Live.

What these bans tell us is that members of Xbox Live feel more vocally uncomfortable about the word gay then other potentially controversial gamertags and profiles.  Is expressing your sexual orientation a “topic or content of a sexual nature?”  I’d say it’s a stretch (after all, it’s really an expression of who I am rather than any actual expression of sexual activity), but Microsoft firmly believes it is.

They’ve repeated that they would ban someone who expressed their heterosexuality as well.  The catch?  It’d probably take a posse of heterophobes reporting that person before they’d even take a look.  I doubt I could find a dozen people on Xbox Live who would want to help me report “TheStraightShooter” or “DireStraights” or even “LadiesMan,” while “RichardGaywood” gets banned.

Sure, Microsoft can stand behind it’s Terms of Use and continue to do this.  That doesn’t make it right, especially when it seems like they’re being pressured into doing so by makeshift bands of anonymous gamers who are simply uncomfortable seeing the word “gay” appear on their TV while chainsawing someone else in half.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 It's Dai Time

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑