Katie & Scott & Simon & Cecily.

Tag: psychology

Day 282: fadchasing

When talking with some co-workers the other day, I made a statement about myself that I found revealing.  I said that I really like fads.

This isn’t to say that I indulge in every fad that I find.  I didn’t go to the midnight showing of New Moon last night due to its immense popularity.  I haven’t gone out and bought this year’s Furby (that’d be the Zhu Zhu Pet, for anybody over the age of 8).  I don’t get caught up in fads in that way.

What I do find intriguing is simply what becomes part of the national zeitgeist.  I love chasing down the latest fad and trying to understand the audience and reasoning behind its usually unlikely and sudden rise in the social consciousness.

It fascinates me to no end that topics, products, useless and impractical inventions can be picked up by a wave of popularity and suddenly be a household word.  What was the turning point in our current interest in vampires?  At what point did Snuggie become a word that anyone reading this could instantly picture in their minds?

What part of the trend captures me?  I think it’s the complete package – the combination of a well-run marketing campaign to the accidental candid celebrity endorsement to the appearances on blogs and Twitter to the unpredictable way word of mouth spreads.

On the flip side, it’s also interesting to examine not only how a fad became so popular but also the effect it can have on people.  With our entire history laid out before us, we can see how previous fads have come and gone; their ephemeral nature is plain to anyone who thinks back on slap bracelets and Tamagochis.

And yet…with every new fad, we find ourselves excited anew by the possibility of being a part of something bigger than just ourselves, if only for a little while.

Day 59: spoiler

I don’t know when the word “spoiler” entered my vernacular (and I’m actually not sure when it started to become popularly used as either a warning or condemnation), but I’m glad it has.

Although I myself don’t particularly like spoilers (I turn up my headphones a bit if people near me at work discuss an episode of Lost I haven’t seen, and I try to remember not to visit entertainment blogs and websites if I know of the possibility of spoilers), I find the passion that surrounds these tiny nuggets of information astounding.

Perhaps the greatest spoiler moment in recent history was when Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was released, and people had the opportunity to “ruin” the book for with three simple words.

It’s fascinating on both ends of the spectrum: first, why do some people get satisfaction out of intentionally spoiling (or is it now spoilering?) twists/endings for others?  And second, why do some people cling so strongly to the belief that hearing a spoiler (be it intentional or not) is so…wrong?

I imagine we have active spoilerers for the same reason that people like to post blatant negative generalizations on message boards, or shoot their teammates in video games, or edit Wikipedia articles to contain random naughty words, or draw on the fire warning signs by elevators.  There’s something in most of us that derives a bit of sinister fun out of what we consider relatively harmless vandalism.  Nobody really suffers when I vandalize a random Wikipedia article or draw flames on the guy running down the stairs on the fire warning sign.  When I spoiler something for someone, that person doesn’t really suffer any kind of enduring mental distress.

The argument that a spoiler has ruined a show or movie or book is a weak argument.  A piece of media isn’t just about the twist or the ending, although M. Night Shymalan may argue differently.

But it makes a certain kind of sense.  When you hear a spoiler, it’s as if you’ve lost a bit of innocence; like the cold hard fact that Santa doesn’t exist (oops, SPOILER, if you’re a kid) has suddenly been thrust into your face again as an adult.

Spoilers feel wrong, for some reason.  When I accidentally read one online (which is much more common now because of DVR technology) or overhear it, I do feel a bit sad for a moment.  But it logically makes little difference.  I’ll still watch an episode of Survivor, even if I know who’s going to get voted off.  I’ll still watch a movie, even if I know one of the main characters dies in the middle of it.  Maybe I’ll watch it in a slightly different way, but if spoilers actually ruined things for me, it would mean I’d never watch an episode of TV or movie or read a book more than once.

So maybe it all boils down to this: if a spoiler ruins something for you, it probably wasn’t that good to begin with.

Day 47: fear of the uncommon yet mundane

Today, I read the following headline on my news feed:

Oregon police say man’s sneezing fit caused him to lose control of car, crash into home

This is scary.  This is scary because it can happen to any of us.  We all sneeze.  Most of us drive.  By simple statistics, we will sneeze while driving probably at least, like, a thousand times in our life.

It’s just another thing to add onto the list of news stories that inspire fear, not due to the fantastical or ghastly nature of them, but because they could happen to any of us.

Even after you filter out all the stories about things we do everyday like drive, fly, and live in areas with natural disasters, there are still those uncommon stories about the most mundane activities leading to our downfall.

It’s why I always feel unjustifiably nervous when walking by a track and field event.  That’s where javelins get thrown into people’s heads.  It’s why I always make sure that when using a hair dryer or toaster, there are no pools or puddles of water nearby.  That’s how people get electrocuted.

Sure, it doesn’t happen all the time.  That’s what makes it scarier!  I can deal with the fact that fender benders and muggings and petty theft of unsecured valuables happen.

But once, a guy watching Lost had his house hit by a meteor.  I watch LOST.  Thus, this could happen to me.

I clearly don’t know how my mind works, but I think it is correct to make these connections.  I’m sure it has something to do with how I was good at chess when I was younger.

© 2024 It's Dai Time

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑