Katie & Scott & Simon & Cecily.

Tag: tv (Page 7 of 8)

Day 68: everything old is new again

There are certain things which I enjoyed as a child that I think I now enjoy for as much nostalgic and novelty value as I do for the actual objective enjoyment of the actual object or activity.

A prime example of this: Klondike bars. They’re deceivingly messy and not as delicious as a half-prices generic ice cream sandwich. But if I eat them now, I’m also remembering all the Klondike bars I ate as a kid, and when I first discovered that ice cream novelties were an entire formal portion of the grocery store. And that’s like eating magic.

Another example is the game Capture the Flag. I’m out of shape and it’s an exhausting game with very little definitive action. There’s a lot of feinting, back-and-forth, and – eventually – panting and walking. But, it also turns everyone into a kid again, when winning was all that mattered! Until you lost. Then it was just the fact that you had made that one awesome capture or gotten away from Speedy Mike.

I think one of the broadest examples of this is media. A few months ago, I watched about half the first season of Boy Meets World. I really enjoyed it, but I think mostly because I remember watching it as a child. The show itself isn’t terrific. The dialogue is groan-worthy most of the time and the lesson of each episode is highly predictable. And yet, there’s something special about watching something that you last saw with very different eyes.

It’s not a bad thing. It’s just a different type of appreciation. I think it’s part of the reason that there’s always a generational gap of understanding. The things that we’ll attempt to get our kids interested in are things of dubious quality that we mainly like for sentimental value. Of course they wouldn’t get it!

Except Boy Meets World. That show is timeless.

Day 59: spoiler

I don’t know when the word “spoiler” entered my vernacular (and I’m actually not sure when it started to become popularly used as either a warning or condemnation), but I’m glad it has.

Although I myself don’t particularly like spoilers (I turn up my headphones a bit if people near me at work discuss an episode of Lost I haven’t seen, and I try to remember not to visit entertainment blogs and websites if I know of the possibility of spoilers), I find the passion that surrounds these tiny nuggets of information astounding.

Perhaps the greatest spoiler moment in recent history was when Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was released, and people had the opportunity to “ruin” the book for with three simple words.

It’s fascinating on both ends of the spectrum: first, why do some people get satisfaction out of intentionally spoiling (or is it now spoilering?) twists/endings for others?  And second, why do some people cling so strongly to the belief that hearing a spoiler (be it intentional or not) is so…wrong?

I imagine we have active spoilerers for the same reason that people like to post blatant negative generalizations on message boards, or shoot their teammates in video games, or edit Wikipedia articles to contain random naughty words, or draw on the fire warning signs by elevators.  There’s something in most of us that derives a bit of sinister fun out of what we consider relatively harmless vandalism.  Nobody really suffers when I vandalize a random Wikipedia article or draw flames on the guy running down the stairs on the fire warning sign.  When I spoiler something for someone, that person doesn’t really suffer any kind of enduring mental distress.

The argument that a spoiler has ruined a show or movie or book is a weak argument.  A piece of media isn’t just about the twist or the ending, although M. Night Shymalan may argue differently.

But it makes a certain kind of sense.  When you hear a spoiler, it’s as if you’ve lost a bit of innocence; like the cold hard fact that Santa doesn’t exist (oops, SPOILER, if you’re a kid) has suddenly been thrust into your face again as an adult.

Spoilers feel wrong, for some reason.  When I accidentally read one online (which is much more common now because of DVR technology) or overhear it, I do feel a bit sad for a moment.  But it logically makes little difference.  I’ll still watch an episode of Survivor, even if I know who’s going to get voted off.  I’ll still watch a movie, even if I know one of the main characters dies in the middle of it.  Maybe I’ll watch it in a slightly different way, but if spoilers actually ruined things for me, it would mean I’d never watch an episode of TV or movie or read a book more than once.

So maybe it all boils down to this: if a spoiler ruins something for you, it probably wasn’t that good to begin with.

Day 55: facts

We received 5/7th of our dining room set this past Saturday. I’ve put a photo of it at the bottom of this post.

There is way too much television on our DVR.

The watchmaker is a 3-part story that is a setup for bigger things to come.

Katie and I did in fact watch part of the Lifetime movie by Nora Roberts that starred Claire from Lost.

My fantasy baseball team’s batters can’t seem to make much contact with the ball so far.

We’re watching an episode of The Amazing Race called Gorilla? Gorilla? Gorilla?

Day 30: financial crisis

I just watched last night’s Daily Show episode, where Jon Stewart takes it pretty badly to Jim Cramer (who was to me, until very recently, just that crazy guy on that one CNBC show).  But the entire episode felt like relief – like Jon Stewart was venting for all of us who don’t understand why we as taxpayers are being stuck with these huge bills for a crisis that we didn’t create.

Or did we?  We recently took out what I consider to be a very reasonable mortgage and Wells Fargo (our bank and mortgage lender) did a pretty exhaustive check of our financial standing.

But, if several years ago, a bank had come to us and told us we could get into a house we really liked with a bad loan, would we have known it was a bad loan?  I’m sure there are people who game the system, but I’d suspect that the majority of average Americans wouldn’t understand that a particular mortgage is unrealistic until it’s too late.

Regardless, the damage is done, and something has to happen.  The American banking system is too important to fail so either the government has to pump a lot of money into the system to keep them afloat or house prices will have to make a dramatic and sudden rebound.  Or the government will keep stuffing smaller amounts of money into the system until housing prices rebound.  Assuming they ever reach the levels before the crisis within a reasonable amount of time, which is not a small assumption.

I’ll stop here, because I don’t want to seem like an expert on what’s going on, but I’d urge anybody who has a few hours and wants to understand what’s going on to check out these three This American Life episodes, which do a great job of spelling out the causes and consequences of the crisis in a way that didn’t require any economics classes:

You can listen to all of them for free online and I felt a lot better afterwards, knowing that I at least can understand the basics of one of the largest and scariest things to ever happen to our world in my lifetime.  This financial crisis is a bit like diabetes; it’s not something that affects my day-to-day life yet, but I know that any day I could wake up and find that things are no longer fine.

If I got diabetes and lost my house and job?  That’d be the worst.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 It's Dai Time

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑